Task guide · comfortable · 20 minutes
Research a topic with reliable sources
Turn a broad question into a bounded, source-linked briefing you can inspect and challenge.
- Situation
- You need more than a quick answer and want to see which claims came from which sources.
- Finished outcome
- A focused briefing with links, disagreements, gaps and next questions kept visible.
The complete workflow
Understand the hand-off before opening a product.
The reading order remains useful without the visual layout: person, AI, review, result.
- 01 · person
You provide
A decision, scope and source rules.
- 02 · ai
AI helps
A cited first briefing across several sources.
- 03 · review
You check
The decisive links, gaps and conflicting claims.
- 04 · result
Finished result
A checked explanation that supports the next human question.
AI helps with
A useful first pass
- Plans research questions
- Finds and compares sources
- Groups evidence, disagreements and unknowns
You bring
Context and responsibility
- Whether sources are primary and current
- Whether citations support the claims
- Missing perspectives and applicability
Worked example
See where the draft changes.
The correction is the core teaching moment, not an optional warning after the result.
What the person provides
Research heat-pump options for a small Melbourne office before a lease renewal. Prioritise official efficiency guidance and installer-independent sources.
The useful first pass
Briefing: three system categories, likely building constraints, government guidance links and a list of assumptions about floor area and existing electrical capacity.
Facts and judgement
The reviewer removes a source written for another climate zone, adds the building’s actual electrical constraint and marks installation cost as unknown pending quotes.
Human-approved outcome
A two-page decision briefing with verified official guidance, building-specific unknowns and five questions for qualified installers.
Try it
Use your own material.
Remove anything you cannot share, replace the bracketed details and keep the checking step.
- Use a direct authoritative source when you need one current fact.
- Do not treat generated citations as verified until you open them.
Research [topic] to help me decide [decision]. Focus on [country/industry] and information from [time period]. Prioritise primary sources and credible independent analysis. Compare the strongest options, disagreements and unknowns. Link every material claim. Finish with what the evidence supports, what it does not support and five questions I should investigate next.
Supporting product guides
Choose a product after the task is clear.
These recommendations are editorial inferences from reviewed provider material. Their evidence state is visible.
The reviewed guide includes a Deep Research workflow for source-linked investigations.
inferred · moderate confidenceOpen the supporting guide →GeminiThe reviewed guide includes research that can combine web material with selected Google files.
inferred · moderate confidenceOpen the supporting guide →KimiThe reviewed guide covers long document sets and multi-step research workflows.
inferred · moderate confidenceOpen the supporting guide →Reviewed content
Sources and review
- Reviewed
- Review by
- Owner
- The Human Bit editorial
One quick check